Quote:
|
We can't just go in and kill Saddam. It's "illegal" to kill a head of state. Also, all this money that people say we're spending, well that's not really true. This 100's of billions of dollars? Well, we're paying that much money when our troops aren't deployed as well. The ships always sail, the troops always march and eat. The fact is, that our cost to maintain troops in this war time scenario in another country is only about 20% higher than when they're not deployed. What some fail to see is that we're are going in to "free" Iraq. Kinda like how people want to "free" tibet. The French won't help us, because they get 40% of their oil from Iraq, where as we only get like 3-8%.
|
"Illegal" to kill a head of state. Yeah but its just so legal to not agree with someone and go in and start a war by killing thousands of them. Im not opposed to a war in Iraq. Hell I think we should go in and take him out. We could send someone in, take him out, and then deny resposibility. Take a page out of the terrrorist handbook. But lets call all this we just can't kill him stuff what it is.... political BS. In case people haven't noticed there are alot of people in this world doing whatever they want to. ya just have to look to North Korea to see it. We could just go in and kill him but you won't see it happen it doesn't fit the political agenda for the war in the first place. They say we need to stop Saddam before he makes and uses weapons of mass destruction. While this is true, you know there has to be something bigger behind it. Come on honestly since when have the politicians really cared about your safety or mine? Its all got some kind of political motivation behind it
edited by: jeepin_madness, Mar 01, 2003 - 10:42 AM[addsig]