Jeepz.com - The ultimate Jeep and offroad site.
Go Back   Jeepz.com > General > General Chat
Jeepz.com, the Ultimate Jeep and Offroad Message Board - Welcome Register today!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2004, 03:00 AM
mingez's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ▌▌▌▌▌▌
Posts: 5,186
Send a message via AIM to mingez Send a message via Yahoo to mingez
Jeep TJ PROBLEM!

One question... why?

__________________


Currently own a 98 XJ bone stock, but click Here: For pics of my TJ and old XJ.
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show mingez gallery mingez
Sponsored Links - Removed for registered members
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2004, 07:58 AM
jps4jeep's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Real Name: Johnny
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,828
Send a message via AIM to jps4jeep
Why Not?

It is in-fact a ford, so it should by nature look like crap.
really, I forget the name of it but ford made a jeep like vehicle way back in the late 30's early 40's trying to compete with willys overland for millitary contracts. Guess who won!

Is my history right, I am so bad with history.
__________________
It's a jeep Thing, you wouldn't understand!
Well I caught your Jeep thing and now it burns to Pee!

-Johnny-

Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show jps4jeep gallery
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2004, 09:56 AM
southtj's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Real Name: Todd
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,890
ques about 2000 Grand Cherokee

I'm at a loss for words.
__________________
04 TJ, 2" lift and 31's
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show southtj gallery
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2004, 10:15 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC/ Cullowhee, NC
Posts: 729
Send a message via AIM to Jeepster05
It's Cold, your bored, what can ya do

Ford produced jeeps during WW2. They were real jeeps not a for look a like. Willies or bantam (I forget which one) couldn't handle the demand of jeeps for the war so Ford was enlisted to help in production.
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show Jeepster05 gallery Jeepster05
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2004, 10:17 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 12
Send a message via AIM to L33TJ33P Send a message via MSN to L33TJ33P Send a message via Yahoo to L33TJ33P
Actually Ford was the main supplier for the Military. they were the only ones that could keep up with the demand. ord made the GP (Government "80" wheelbase) Recon auto. so in the first years the Jeep as we know it today was mostly FORD.
__________________
On a long enough time-line,
The survival rate for everyone
Drops to Zero!


http://home.comcast.net/%7Ewaldenjg/
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show L33TJ33P gallery
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2004, 10:26 AM
Tug-n-pull's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 5,149
Send a message via ICQ to Tug-n-pull
Quote:
Originally Posted by L33TJ33P
Actually Ford was the main supplier for the Military. they were the only ones that could keep up with the demand. ord made the GP (Government "80" wheelbase) Recon auto. so in the first years the Jeep as we know it today was mostly FORD.
So it is proven to put a Chevy 350 in a Jeep is just plain wrong! hehehehe tug
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show Tug-n-pull gallery
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2004, 03:39 PM
redrooster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,753
That is the most dangerous looking hunk of $h!t I have ever seen. It should be illegal to have lift blocks that long on the supension. I bet you could turn it over climbing in.
__________________
Safety yellow and Handicap blue CJ with 5.3 Vortec/TH400/Tons/Atlas/Roks/Locks and Airshocks.
1622 Miles from Moab.
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show redrooster gallery
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2004, 08:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 921
Send a message via AIM to bryanjeep
Welders

[/quote]

So it is proven to put a Chevy 350 in a Jeep is just plain wrong! hehehehe tug[/quote]

Nope, NOT AT ALL! It beats having a 4 cyl Jeep engine like mine. Not for long, hehehe
__________________

I am going to invent WET
White Entertainment Television
www.cardomain.com/id/bryanjeep
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show bryanjeep gallery bryanjeep
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2004, 08:55 PM
Snitty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Olean, NY
Posts: 5,644
Send a message via AIM to Snitty
and it DOES look to be from the WWII era.. it very well could be a ford
__________________
93 YJ 4.0
Spring Over, 33x12.50 Mastercraft Courser M/T, High Flow Exhaust, Diamondplate Rear Bumper, Trimmed Flares, 6\" spotters

We, the Sovereign People of the Universe, wish to live in peace. We live among you, but we are not of you.
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show Snitty gallery
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2004, 09:51 PM
mingez's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ▌▌▌▌▌▌
Posts: 5,186
Send a message via AIM to mingez Send a message via Yahoo to mingez
Alls I know is that thing is soooo Booty Fabbed it's scary. Those lifts... yikes.

Horrible.
__________________


Currently own a 98 XJ bone stock, but click Here: For pics of my TJ and old XJ.
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show mingez gallery mingez
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2004, 10:27 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,371
Send a message via Yahoo to XJNick
Hmm... not sure what to think about that...

Or in the words of the Simpson's Comic book guy,
"There is No Emoticon for what I am feeling..."

-Nick
__________________
1988 Jeep Cherokee w/ 410,000+ miles. Now a 100% Electric Vehicle!
NO Gas, NO Emissions, NO Problem! -- http://www.DriveEV.com/

Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show XJNick gallery XJNick
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2004, 02:27 AM
Snitty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Olean, NY
Posts: 5,644
Send a message via AIM to Snitty
well... it DOES seem to have control arms.. so the blocks that big are really not posing much of a threat to the axle movement aspect, other than side to side, which can be fixed with the right control arms... but... there really is no travel in the suspension... the whole axle would have to move to one side, which then defeats the previous statement.. so its still not a good idea... show only
__________________
93 YJ 4.0
Spring Over, 33x12.50 Mastercraft Courser M/T, High Flow Exhaust, Diamondplate Rear Bumper, Trimmed Flares, 6\" spotters

We, the Sovereign People of the Universe, wish to live in peace. We live among you, but we are not of you.
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show Snitty gallery
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2004, 08:45 AM
jps4jeep's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Real Name: Johnny
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,828
Send a message via AIM to jps4jeep
if you look closely, there are no shocks! also if the suspension was to flex in anyway which is probably would with factory springs and 15inch lift blocks, the ford symbol attached to the front end would be crushed.
__________________
It's a jeep Thing, you wouldn't understand!
Well I caught your Jeep thing and now it burns to Pee!

-Johnny-

Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show jps4jeep gallery
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2004, 09:29 AM
redrooster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,753
GOT TO ASK THIS QUESTION

I just fon't think you can get a ubolt tight enough to take the lean out of it with block that high. Just too much leverage with the body way up there. Not to mention it just looks stupid.
I'd like to climb that tire with my Jeep and continue straight on over the hood.
__________________
Safety yellow and Handicap blue CJ with 5.3 Vortec/TH400/Tons/Atlas/Roks/Locks and Airshocks.
1622 Miles from Moab.
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show redrooster gallery
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2004, 10:28 AM
west747's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: N.B. Canada
Posts: 606
Send a message via ICQ to west747 Send a message via AIM to west747 Send a message via MSN to west747
i like the look of it but as far as trail worthyness goes its gets nothing
__________________

my junk waiting for Hi-Steer + rear driveshaft
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show west747 gallery west747
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2004, 04:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Real Name: Chris
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 2,313
Bantam,Willys, and Ford all submitted test vehicles. Bantam was the original intented supplier, but they could have never met production. Actually the Willys and Ford designs were based on the Bantam prototypes, but being better auto manufacturers they made critical improvements. Willys initially won the contract, and couldn't meet production. So, Ford was given the greenlight to produce their version of the Willys design to help meet the demand for production. Ford, being the *******s they are, tried to put Ford emblems all over the Willys design until the military made them stop. That's why flatfenders with the Ford script on the body are so rare. Ford was simply a contracted manufacturer of someone else's auto design. At least that's the most common version of the "official history" stories that I have seen.


Someone should rescue that Jeep body and the rims/tires.....then haul the rest of it to the scrap yard before that guy tries to drive it and kills himself.
__________________
America: the land of the free, because of the brave. Please support our troops.
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Send a private message to %1$s Show Junkpile gallery
Sponsored Links - Removed for registered members
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 AM.

Message Board Statistics

 Subscribe in a reader
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0