|
|
This section
Sponsored By
|
|
|
|

12-25-2004, 02:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 33
|
|
|
Ok...Here's my choices...my dad wants to give me a new car for xmas...basically incentive to keep me from buying a Mustang before im done with college, and give me something more fun then my Shadow.
He has a 90 Cherokee 200k on the body which needs a repaint, rebuilt engine, tranny is showing signs of wear. Runs very well with rebuilt engine, gets 22-24mpg. Planning on lift and 31's.
He recently bought a 95 Grand Cherokee, 175k, everythings stock. Leather, power everthing, red, ect. Engine is tired, gets 16-18mpg.Planning on lift and 31's.
Which would you take?
Im planning on going with a Rusty's lift, but he's funding me, 3.5 inch on either one, whichever i take. Does Rusty have good prices, or could I find cheaper kits elsewhere?
I'd like to put Jerry Can's on whichever one i take, any ideas how or any kits?
Merry Xmas
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links - Removed for registered members
|
|
|

12-25-2004, 03:01 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Smokey Mountains, NC in spirit....Jackson, LA in body
Posts: 3,595
|
|
__________________
The only terrorists I fear reside in Washington, DC.
'03 TJ - 31x10 Trailcutter M/T's, 9000# Winch, Hi-Lift Jack, TopFive roof rack, only vehicle I own, takes me everywhere
|
|
|

12-25-2004, 03:39 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
Real Name: Harry
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 8,912
|
|
|
If the XJ has the 4.0L I'd take that one since it's rebuilt. If it is the 2.8 I'd get the grand cherokee.
|
|
|

12-25-2004, 03:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 33
|
|
|
RE: Cherokee or Grand Cherokee? Choices? Questions ECT...
both have I-6's...
Anybody have any info on lift kits? Rusty's looks promising simply because for 300 some odd bucks you get the lift, brake line extension, and shocks, all of which the XJ needs...
|
|
|

12-27-2004, 10:44 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,388
|
|
|
well as far as lifts go, you dont need 3.5 on the zj for 31's. i have a 1996 zj with a 2" bb and 31's and it runs fine. so that could save you some money.
as far as which to go with, the tired engine would scare me away from the zj, and you'll have a much easier time finding parts for the xj. so even as a grand owner myself, i'd probably have a hard time turning down the xj in this situation.
__________________
Jack Bauer kills for Jesus: 10
|
|
|

12-27-2004, 01:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
Real Name: Chris
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 2,313
|
|
|
dana 30 w/ ARB and 4.10
Hey bchcky, is it just me, or does the guy in the far left of your sig pic look like he just dropped a load in his britches.
As far as which Jeep to get, I'd take the Cherokee because of the lower cost to build and repair. Or.....I'd take the one worth the most, then sell it, and buy a SWB. :)
__________________
America: the land of the free, because of the brave. Please support our troops.
|
|
|

12-27-2004, 02:06 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Jeep :
Year :
Lift :
Tires :
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 9,996
|
|
|
newyears run..........oregon
The ZJ will ride better, has fewer miles, and the 4.0L HO engine. The XJ has the Renix 4.0L, a little more problematic, less aftermarket support, less HP, and overall less desirable engine.
The ZJ is usually a little more costly when it comes to aftermarket suspensions, due to the rear being coil springs and more costly than the XJ's rear leaf springs.
Rusty has some good lifts at great prices, you won't be disappointed. Also check out Rough Country if you want to save some cash on a decent lift.
|
|
|

12-27-2004, 09:33 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
Real Name: Harry
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 8,912
|
|
|
RE: Re: RE: adding a 2" lift to front
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Junkpile
Hey bchcky, is it just me, or does the guy in the far left of your sig pic look like he just dropped a load in his britches.
|
Looks like you may have found Jason Alexander's stunt double from the movie Shallow Hal.
" Ya like dogs do ya?"
|
|
|

12-28-2004, 02:21 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,388
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Junkpile
Hey bchcky, is it just me, or does the guy in the far left of your sig pic look like he just dropped a load in his britches.
|
thats what he's doing! haha, thanks junk, i never really figured out what the facial expression signified.
__________________
Jack Bauer kills for Jesus: 10
|
|
|

12-28-2004, 04:42 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Jeep :
Year :
Lift :
Tires :
|
Grand Cherokee
1995
Stock
30"
|
|
Real Name: Joe Irvine
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Manahawkin NJ
Posts: 1,306
|
|
|
ZJ all the way.. much smoother ride and you can get 31's with the 2" life like BCHCKY says... The ZJ is also much more flexy than the XJ because of the rear coils... Don't let the 175k scare you.. its just getting broken in.....
__________________
When I Die, Bury me in my JEEP. 'Cause it's never been in a hole it couldn't get out of!
1995 Grand Cherokee w/ swaybar disconnects and 30" tires and a 2000 Grand Cherokee stock.
|
|
|

12-28-2004, 05:20 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,388
|
|
|
RE: yj parts
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by graewulf
Don't let the 175k scare you.. its just getting broken in.....
|
it wasnt that so much that scared me as the fact that he said the engine is tired. i mean you take an xj and zj, say same year, engine and mileage side by side, and you want to just run 31's on both, its cheaper to go with the zj for the lift and stuff. but when considering the specific vehicles that he mentioned, i only said the xj because he said the zj engine was getting tired.
__________________
Jack Bauer kills for Jesus: 10
|
|
|

12-29-2004, 07:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,527
|
|
Hi,
If you're worried about fuel economy, get neither. :P
But since I myself love Jeeps (and don't want to get flamed off this board  ), I'd choose the XJ Cherokee. I used to get 19.1 to 20.5 miles per gallon in my Cherokee. It has a manual transmission, which is more efficient than an auto would be. Though, I don't think 22 - 24 miles per gallon is possible in an Inline 6 Cherokee (at least, as hard as I tried, I could never achieve that).
-Nick 
__________________
1988 Jeep Cherokee w/ 410,000+ miles. Now a 100% Electric Vehicle!
NO Gas, NO Emissions, NO Problem! -- http://www.DriveEV.com/
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.
|