
11-09-2003, 12:33 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 31
|
|
well i just put some 35 inch baja claws on my cj5 and im worried about the stock 2 peice axles in the amc20 rear end holding up if i do any wheeling at all. its a late 79 and has a dana 300 transfer case in it. i know where i could get a dana 44 out of an older cj5 that has the offset carrier. could this rearend work in my jeep? cause i could prolly buy it cheaper than i could a set of one peice axles for my 20. which would be stronger, my model 20 with 1 peice axles, or a stock 44?
kolby
__________________
79 cj5 258
2.5 rancho and 1 inch body
35\" baja claw radials
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links - Removed for registered members
|
|
|

11-09-2003, 12:38 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 5,149
|
|
|
I would run it till I needed to change it. There is a truss you can buy if I am not mistaken for the amc 20. With the one piece axels you should be fine and why fix it if it aint broken. I too have an amc 20 and was so sad for a while about it. Then I hear some folks even like the thing and say good things about it. Just run it a while and see how it holds up for you. tug
|
|
|

11-09-2003, 07:45 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: N.B. Canada
Posts: 606
|
|
|
you dont rally want a dana 44 with an offset carrier. is it out of a waggoner?
__________________

my junk waiting for Hi-Steer + rear driveshaft
|
|
|

11-09-2003, 09:50 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 31
|
|
|
check engine!!!
the 44 is out of an early cj so its the same width as my narrow trac front so i could leave it alone. and about the why fix it if it aint broken, because me (16 year old with leadfoot) + amc20 with 2 peice axles+35s = something broken on the trail away from all my tools and my nice clean shop. i dont have one peice axles but i could buy the dana 44 for cheaper than i could some one peice axles. my question is WILL IT WORK WITH THE OFFSET CARRIER?
__________________
79 cj5 258
2.5 rancho and 1 inch body
35\" baja claw radials
|
|
|

11-09-2003, 01:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: arkansas, or 34*06'N-93*04'W
Posts: 2,052
|
|
Quote:
|
WILL IT WORK WITH THE OFFSET CARRIER?
|
NO
__________________
82 CJ5 that dont run.... and is no more.... 94 Z71

J, you wont be forgotten
|
|
|

11-09-2003, 02:14 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 5,149
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lankchevy
WILL IT WORK WITH THE OFFSET CARRIER?
|
Why are you yelling at us! tug
|
|
|

11-09-2003, 11:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 31
|
|
|
sorry didnt realy mean to yell. i put it caps because that was my main question, if it would work or not, and noone had ansered it, u said i should keep my 20 but noone ever said it wouldnt work, which was what i was looking for.
kolby
__________________
79 cj5 258
2.5 rancho and 1 inch body
35\" baja claw radials
|
|
|

11-09-2003, 11:48 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 8,639
|
|
|
No, don't use the offset diff D44.
Look at front and rear Wagoneer axles, they'll be either D44 front and rear or HDAMC20 rear and D44 front. These will increase your track width making things much safer, especially since you are so tall on a narrow track.
|
|
|

11-10-2003, 08:02 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 31
|
|
|
if i went with waggy axles then would i have to get new perches welded on or are they already in the right spots?
kolby
__________________
79 cj5 258
2.5 rancho and 1 inch body
35\" baja claw radials
|
|
|

11-10-2003, 12:55 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 8,639
|
|
You'd have to weld new perches and probably shock brackets on the new axles. You may have to build outriggers on the frame to mount the leaf springs further out from the frame, not sure on a '79. If you've got narrowtrac, you probably need to move those leaf springs out further. You will need new rims, Waggy rims are 6-lug.
Also consider D44's from a Scout, wider than your CJ but narrower than the Waggy. The front D44 has 0* caster, so you may have to get the knuckles cut and rewelded to get the proper pinion angle and caster.
It's a pretty good project either way, lot's of fab work. The 1piece axleshafts and axle truss are probably looking a lot better now, huh
|
|
|

11-10-2003, 11:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 31
|
|
|
still thinking about waggys just for the fact that i want to get wider so im not so tippy. so if i went waggys it would be about the same work as doing a spring over? weld on new perches and shock mounts. why exactly would i need to outboard my springs? if im not mistaken then wouldnt leaving them where there at give me beter flex than if i moved them out? what would be the advantages of moving them out? yes it would make it more stable but i dont realy have any stabilty problems right now so why fix it if its not broke?
kolby
__________________
79 cj5 258
2.5 rancho and 1 inch body
35\" baja claw radials
|
|
|

11-10-2003, 11:35 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: arkansas, or 34*06'N-93*04'W
Posts: 2,052
|
|
|
Noisy Lift
you have to move them out b/c if you dont you will have to mount one spring on top of the pumpkin....
__________________
82 CJ5 that dont run.... and is no more.... 94 Z71

J, you wont be forgotten
|
|
|

11-11-2003, 09:44 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: N.B. Canada
Posts: 606
|
|
|
but that is only for the front. you do not have to outboard the springs for the rear.
__________________

my junk waiting for Hi-Steer + rear driveshaft
|
|
|

11-11-2003, 01:08 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 8,639
|
|
|
About the same work as a SOA, so why not do it?
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links - Removed for registered members
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.
|